Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorHaugen, Kjetil K.
dc.date.accessioned2023-03-14T14:13:12Z
dc.date.available2023-03-14T14:13:12Z
dc.date.created2017-06-20T08:01:22Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.citationEuropean Journal of Sport Studies (EJSS), 2017, 4(1-2)en_US
dc.identifier.issn2282-5673
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3058215
dc.description.abstractThis commentary discusses how the rules of the game may affect doping positively and negatively. The link between rules and doping prevalence is established. Some examples are given, indicating what to do and not. The main scientific outcome of the paper is perhaps that the fight against doping can be performed cheaper than through classical means such as improved test quality/higher test frequency, or less progressive (more egalitarian) prize functions, or tougher sanctions. As such, the recommended strategy may be seen as a “Columbi Egg”. But, as always, nothing comes for free, and some serious creativity in sport redesign is needed to realize this method’s potential. Keywords: economics of doping, sport redesign, sport complexity, uncertainty of outcome, anti dopingen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.ejss-journal.com/index.php/fighting-doping-through-sport-redesign
dc.titleFighting doping through sport redesignen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume4en_US
dc.source.journalEuropean Journal of Sport Studies (EJSS)en_US
dc.source.issue1-2en_US
dc.identifier.cristin1477343
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record