Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorEriksen, Bjørn Magne Sundsbø
dc.contributor.authorFærden, Ann
dc.contributor.authorLockertsen, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorBjørkly, Stål
dc.contributor.authorRoaldset, John Olav
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-02T10:41:18Z
dc.date.available2022-11-02T10:41:18Z
dc.date.created2018-04-25T09:46:09Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPsychiatry Research. 2018, 264 (June), 270-280.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0165-1781
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3029557
dc.description.abstractCurrent violence risk assessment methods seem to have reached an upper limit of accuracy. More comprehensive biopsychosocial models may improve on existing methods. Research on gender differences concerning risk factors of violence is scarce and inconclusive. In this prospective study from an acute psychiatric ward, all patients admitted from March 2012 to March 2013 were included. Predictive validity and potential gender differences in a biopsychosocial model of violence risk assessment consisting of a psychosocial checklist (Violence risk screening-10, V-RISK-10), a patient's self-report risk scale (SRS), total cholesterol (TC) and highdensity lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) were examined in an inpatient (N=348) and a 3-months follow-up (N=101) sample. Overall increases in explained variances and predictive values were small and non-significant compared to V-RISK-10 alone. In the inpatient sample, HDL contributed significantly to the model for men but not for women. In the follow-up sample, SRS contributed significantly for the whole sample. Results indicated that the biopsychosocial model we tested partially improved accuracy of violence risk assessments in acute psychiatry and that gender differences may exist. Keywords: acute psychiatry, total cholesterol, HDL, self-report, V-RISK-10, biomarkers, screening toolsen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.rightsAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titlePredictive validity and gender differences in a biopsychosocial model of violence risk assessment in acute psychiatryen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionacceptedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber270-280en_US
dc.source.volume264en_US
dc.source.journalPsychiatry Researchen_US
dc.source.issueJuneen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.psychres.2018.04.021
dc.identifier.cristin1581486
cristin.unitcode211,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helse- og sosialfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.fulltextpostprint
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internasjonal