Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorVossius, Corinna Elisabeth
dc.contributor.authorSelbæk, Geir
dc.contributor.authorSaltyte Benth, Jurate
dc.contributor.authorWimo, A.
dc.contributor.authorEngedal, Knut
dc.contributor.authorKirkevold, Øyvind
dc.contributor.authorRokstad, Anne Marie Mork
dc.date.accessioned2022-11-08T12:46:01Z
dc.date.available2022-11-08T12:46:01Z
dc.date.created2019-08-12T14:30:57Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.citationPLOS ONE. 2019, 14 (8), 1-12en_US
dc.identifier.issn1932-6203
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3030662
dc.description.abstractBackground: Day care services aim to offer meaningful activities and a safe environment for the attendees and a respite for family caregivers while being cost effective. This study compares the use of formal and informal care in users and non-users of day care centres designed for persons with dementia. Method: Users of day care designed for dementia (DC group) and non-users (NDC group) were followed over a period of 24 months or until nursing home admission (NHA) respectively death. Demographic and clinical characteristics were collected at baseline and after 12 and 24 months. The use of care was recorded by Resource Utilization in Dementia (RUD). Results: A total of 257 persons with dementia participated in the study, 181 in the DC group and 76 in the NDC group. Users of day care centres cause higher costs due to the expenses for day care, while neither the use of home nursing, secondary care, informal care nor the time until NHA did show any differences between users and non-users. The overall costs were higher in the DC group at baseline and after 12 months, but this difference was no longer present at the end of the two-year study period. Conclusion: Our results indicate no potential cost-saving effect of day care designed for people with dementia, as the use of day care did neither result in a reduced use of care nor in a delay of NHA. Future research should balance the non-monetary benefits of day care against its costs for a full cost-effectiveness analysis, most favourable in a RCT-design.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0219568&type=printable
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleCost analysis of day care centres in Norwayen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-12en_US
dc.source.volume14en_US
dc.source.journalPLOS ONEen_US
dc.source.issue8en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0219568
dc.identifier.cristin1715334
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 222083en_US
dc.source.articlenumbere0219568en_US
cristin.unitcode211,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helse- og sosialfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal