dc.contributor.author | Sæbjørnsen, Siv Elin Nord | |
dc.contributor.author | Ellingsen, Ingunn T | |
dc.contributor.author | Good, James M.M. | |
dc.contributor.author | Ødegård, Atle | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-02-21T17:02:58Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-02-21T17:02:58Z | |
dc.date.created | 2016-09-19T15:17:14Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2016 | |
dc.identifier.citation | Operant Subjectivity. 2016, 38 (2), 15-32. | en_US |
dc.identifier.issn | 0193-2713 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/11250/3052903 | |
dc.description.abstract | An important step in any Q-methodological study is the identification of the concourse and the development of the Q set. Inspired by the writings of William Stephenson (1953) and Steven Brown (1980) about the development of the Q set, we illustrate how two different approaches to Q sampling, naturalistic and theoretical, may be combined. We draw on examples from a Q study scrutinizing adolescents’ subjective viewpoints about collaboration and participation in interprofessional teams. The example is used to illustrate how naturalistic and theoretical approaches to Q sampling may be combined in the same research design. The Concourse Box is introduced as a new tool to help visualize these joint contributions. Keywords: adolescents, concourse, Concourse Box, Q sampling, theoretical and naturalistic sampling. | en_US |
dc.language.iso | eng | en_US |
dc.relation.uri | http://www.operantsubjectivity.org/pub/843/ | |
dc.title | Combining a naturalistic and theoretical Q sample approach : an empirical research illustration | en_US |
dc.type | Peer reviewed | en_US |
dc.type | Journal article | en_US |
dc.description.version | publishedVersion | en_US |
dc.source.pagenumber | 15-32 | en_US |
dc.source.volume | 38 | en_US |
dc.source.journal | Operant Subjectivity | en_US |
dc.source.issue | 2 | en_US |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15133/j.os.2016.005 | |
dc.identifier.cristin | 1382890 | |
cristin.ispublished | true | |
cristin.fulltext | original | |
cristin.qualitycode | 1 | |