Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorSæbjørnsen, Siv Elin Nord
dc.contributor.authorEllingsen, Ingunn T
dc.contributor.authorGood, James M.M.
dc.contributor.authorØdegård, Atle
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-21T17:02:58Z
dc.date.available2023-02-21T17:02:58Z
dc.date.created2016-09-19T15:17:14Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.identifier.citationOperant Subjectivity. 2016, 38 (2), 15-32.en_US
dc.identifier.issn0193-2713
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3052903
dc.description.abstractAn important step in any Q-methodological study is the identification of the concourse and the development of the Q set. Inspired by the writings of William Stephenson (1953) and Steven Brown (1980) about the development of the Q set, we illustrate how two different approaches to Q sampling, naturalistic and theoretical, may be combined. We draw on examples from a Q study scrutinizing adolescents’ subjective viewpoints about collaboration and participation in interprofessional teams. The example is used to illustrate how naturalistic and theoretical approaches to Q sampling may be combined in the same research design. The Concourse Box is introduced as a new tool to help visualize these joint contributions. Keywords: adolescents, concourse, Concourse Box, Q sampling, theoretical and naturalistic sampling.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttp://www.operantsubjectivity.org/pub/843/
dc.titleCombining a naturalistic and theoretical Q sample approach : an empirical research illustrationen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber15-32en_US
dc.source.volume38en_US
dc.source.journalOperant Subjectivityen_US
dc.source.issue2en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15133/j.os.2016.005
dc.identifier.cristin1382890
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel