Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Filipe
dc.contributor.authorAgra, Agostinho
dc.contributor.authorHvattum, Lars Magnus
dc.contributor.authorRequejo, Cristina
dc.date.accessioned2023-11-08T13:11:40Z
dc.date.available2023-11-08T13:11:40Z
dc.date.created2021-03-31T10:47:47Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.citationJournal of Heuristics. 2021, 27 (3), 459-496.en_US
dc.identifier.issn1381-1231
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3101429
dc.description.abstractProximity search is an iterative method to solve complex mathematical programming problems. At each iteration, the objective function of the problem at hand is replaced by the Hamming distance function to a given solution, and a cutoff constraint is added to impose that any new obtained solution improves the objective function value. A mixed integer programming solver is used to find a feasible solution to this modified problem, yielding an improved solution to the original problem. This paper introduces the concept of weighted Hamming distance that allows to design a new method called weighted proximity search. In this new distance function, low weights are associated with the variables whose value in the current solution is promising to change in order to find an improved solution, while high weights are assigned to variables that are expected to remain unchanged. The weights help to distinguish between alternative solutions in the neighborhood of the current solution, and provide guidance to the solver when trying to locate an improved solution. Several strategies to determine weights are presented, including both static and dynamic strategies. The proposed weighted proximity search is compared with the classic proximity search on instances from three optimization problems: the p-median problem, the set covering problem, and the stochastic lot-sizing problem. The obtained results show that a suitable choice of weights allows the weighted proximity search to obtain better solutions, for 75% of the cases, than the ones obtained by using proximity search and for 96% of the cases the solutions are better than the ones obtained by running a commercial solver with a time limit.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10732-021-09466-0
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleWeighted proximity searchen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber459-496en_US
dc.source.volume27en_US
dc.source.journalJournal of Heuristicsen_US
dc.source.issue3en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10732-021-09466-0
dc.identifier.cristin1901809
dc.relation.projectNorges forskningsråd: 263031en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode2


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal