Vis enkel innførsel

dc.contributor.authorHusebø, Anne Marie Lunde
dc.contributor.authorSøreide, Jon Arne
dc.contributor.authorKørner, Hartwig
dc.contributor.authorStorm, Marianne
dc.contributor.authorWathne, Hege Bjøkne
dc.contributor.authorRichardson, Alison
dc.contributor.authorMorken, Ingvild Margreta
dc.contributor.authorUrstad, Kristin Hjorthaug
dc.contributor.authorNordfonn, Oda Karin
dc.contributor.authorKarlsen, Bjørg
dc.date.accessioned2024-03-08T10:15:08Z
dc.date.available2024-03-08T10:15:08Z
dc.date.created2024-01-26T09:53:43Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.citationSupportive Care in Cancer. 2024, 32 (1), 11en_US
dc.identifier.issn0941-4355
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3121529
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Colorectal cancer (CRC) creates elevated self-management demands and unmet support needs post-discharge. Follow-up care through eHealth post-primary surgery may be an effective means of supporting patients’ needs. This integrative review describes the evidence regarding eHealth interventions post-hospital discharge focusing on delivery mode, user-interface and content, patient intervention adherence, impact on patient-reported outcomes and experiences of eHealth. Methods: A university librarian performed literature searches in 2021 using four databases. After screening 1149 records, the authors read 30 full-text papers and included and extracted data from 26 papers. Two authors analysed the extracted data using the ‘framework synthesis approach’. Results: The 26 papers were published between 2012 and 2022. The eHealth interventions were mainly delivered by telephone with the assistance of healthcare professionals, combined with text messages or video conferencing. The user interfaces included websites, applications and physical activity (PA) trackers. The interventions comprised the monitoring of symptoms or health behaviours, patient information, education and counselling. Evidence showed a better psychological state and improved PA. Patients reported high satisfaction with eHealth. However, patient adherence was inadequately reported. Conclusions: eHealth interventions may positively impact CRC patients’ anxiety and PA regardless of the user interface. Patients prefer technology combined with a human element.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.uri10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal*
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no*
dc.titleeHealth interventions to support colorectal cancer patients’ self-management after discharge from surgery : an integrative literature reviewen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.volume32en_US
dc.source.journalSupportive Care in Canceren_US
dc.source.issue1en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s00520-023-08191-7
dc.identifier.cristin2234975
dc.source.articlenumber11en_US
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Tilhørende fil(er)

Thumbnail

Denne innførselen finnes i følgende samling(er)

Vis enkel innførsel

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Med mindre annet er angitt, så er denne innførselen lisensiert som Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal