Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorNyberg, Stian Kwak
dc.contributor.authorBerg, Ole Kristian
dc.contributor.authorHelgerud, Jan
dc.contributor.authorWang, Eivind
dc.date.accessioned2022-10-17T08:36:50Z
dc.date.available2022-10-17T08:36:50Z
dc.date.created2018-05-22T11:47:16Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.citationPhysiological Reports. 2018, 6:e13696 (10), 1-11.en_US
dc.identifier.issn2051-817X
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/11250/3026319
dc.description.abstractAssessment of forearm oxygen uptake (O2) during handgrip exercise is a keenly investigated concept for observing small muscle mass metabolism. Although a combination of Doppler ultrasound measurements of brachial artery blood flow () and blood gas drawn from a deep forearm vein has been utilized to calculate forearm O2 for more than two decades, the applicability of this experimental design may benefit from a thorough evaluation of its reliability during graded exercise. Therefore, we evaluated the reliability of this technique during incremental handgrip exercise in ten healthy young (24&nbsp;±&nbsp;3(SD) years.) males. O2 and work rate (WR) exhibited a linear relationship (1.0&nbsp;W: 43.8&nbsp;±&nbsp;10.1&nbsp;mL·min−1; 1.5&nbsp;W: 53.8&nbsp;±&nbsp;14.1&nbsp;mL·min−1; 2.0&nbsp;W: 63.4&nbsp;±&nbsp;16.3&nbsp;mL·min−1; 2.5&nbsp;W: 72.2&nbsp;±&nbsp;17.6&nbsp;mL·min−1; 3.0&nbsp;W: 79.2&nbsp;±&nbsp;18.6&nbsp;mL·min−1; r&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.65, P&nbsp;<&nbsp;0.01). In turn, O2 was strongly associated with (1.0&nbsp;W: 359&nbsp;±&nbsp;86&nbsp;mL·min−1; 1.5&nbsp;W: 431&nbsp;±&nbsp;112&nbsp;mL·min−1; 2.0&nbsp;W: 490&nbsp;±&nbsp;123&nbsp;mL·min−1; 2.5&nbsp;W: 556&nbsp;±&nbsp;112&nbsp;mL·min−1; 3.0&nbsp;W: 622&nbsp;±&nbsp;131&nbsp;mL·min−1; r&nbsp;=&nbsp;0.96; P&nbsp;<&nbsp;0.01), whereas arteriovenous oxygen difference (a‐vO2diff) remained constant following all WRs (123&nbsp;±&nbsp;11–130&nbsp;±&nbsp;10&nbsp;mL·L−1). Average O2 test–retest difference was −0.4&nbsp;mL·min−1 with ±2SD limits of agreement (LOA) of 8.4 and −9.2&nbsp;mL·min−1, respectively, whereas coefficients of variation (CVs) ranged from 4–7%. Accordingly, test–retest difference was 11.9&nbsp;mL·min−1 (LOA: 84.1&nbsp;mL·min−1; −60.4&nbsp;mL·min−1) with CVs between 4 and 7%. Test–retest difference for a‐vO2diff was −0.28&nbsp;mL·dL−1 (LOA: 1.26mL·dL−1; −1.82&nbsp;mL·dL−1) with 3–5% CVs. In conclusion, our results revealed that forearm O2 determination by Doppler ultrasound and direct venous sampling is linearly related to WR, and a reliable experimental design across a range of exercise intensities.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.relation.urihttps://physoc.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.14814/phy2.13696
dc.rightsNavngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.no
dc.titleReliability of forearm oxygen uptake during handgrip exercise : assessment by ultrasonography and venous blood gasen_US
dc.typePeer revieweden_US
dc.typeJournal articleen_US
dc.description.versionpublishedVersionen_US
dc.source.pagenumber1-11en_US
dc.source.volume6en_US
dc.source.journalPhysiological Reportsen_US
dc.source.issue10en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.14814/phy2.13696
dc.identifier.cristin1585891
dc.source.articlenumbere13696en_US
cristin.unitcode211,2,0,0
cristin.unitnameAvdeling for helse- og sosialfag
cristin.ispublishedtrue
cristin.fulltextoriginal
cristin.qualitycode1


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal
Except where otherwise noted, this item's license is described as Navngivelse 4.0 Internasjonal